Most elections bodies maintain two sets of training content:

  1. General content that is required for all audiences: messages on politeness, impartiality, the flow of the polling station, what to bring to work on election days, when to arrive, etc.
  2. Role-specific content: this is content that only applies to specific roles within the polling station or returning office. The elections official directing electors as they enter the polling station doesn’t need to understand how to prepare ballots for electors, and the person preparing ballots doesn’t need to know how to direct electors when they enter the building.

There is a risk in combining these two streams to create a one-size-fits-all course. Chief among them is diluting the message by shying away from details, which is the opposite of what you want. Your learners will only take on so much of the information you are providing – it’s just the way our brains work – so, we want to deliver the most important information that is related to what is expected of the learner on election day or in preparation for election day.

Instead, each role should receive a course specific to the function it fulfills, but that course should take advantage of re-usability in its design.

Our team of eLearning experts will help you:


Role A’s course consists of four common topics and three that are Role-A specific.  All other roles reuse those four common topics interspersed with topics specific to each.


NEXT: Diversity —>



  • I want to thank you again for SLI's independent assessment of Broomfield's election procedures and subsequent development of updated election procedures. SLI's work assisted the City Council greatly in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of existing systems and helped restore confidence in these systems for future elections.

    James L. Becklenberg

    Former Assistant City and County Manager

  • It is with sincere gratitude and appreciation that we unconditionally recommend SLI. Our effort to obtain Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification for our community health software platform required significant interpretation of the federal guidelines that SLI provided in plain English, on an as needed, and always timely basis. The staff is outstanding and their attitude is nothing less than grace under pressure. To keep it all together, with client after client struggling to interpret often vague federal guidelines, is laudable. The bottom line is that we had a choice, and we went with a recommendation for SLI based on a couple interviews with folks that preceded us, and it turned out to be the best possible decision.

    Milton Allione


  • I sought SLI’s assistance in providing information to me on testing practices for the Uniform Voting System (UVS) that the State of Colorado is seeking. I also worked with them as they developed a report for the Colorado Voter Access and Modernized Elections Commission on an assessment of voting system technology in Colorado. The results provided by SLI were valuable and helped the state make key decisions regarding Colorado's UVS strategy. As our project moves forward, we expect to call upon SLI to test one or more proposed systems to meet Colorado Voting System Certification Standards.

    Al Davidson

    Former Program Manager

  • The SLI team, in my opinion, was outstanding. I truly appreciated this process and all the guidance they provided. Not only did this team well represent themselves and the expertise they possess, but also well represented the SLI organization. I would highly recommend SLI to anyone...

    Norman Joseph

    Vice President, Product Management

  • We are so gratified that our cumulative efforts have yielded the much-needed results. I must hasten to add that the work of the entire SLI team has lent so much credibility to this entire electoral process. For this alone, you have the gratitude of not just this member of the Technical Evaluation Committee, but more likely that of an entire nation.

    Tim Diaz de Rivera

    Director General, National Computing Center